Matrix showing Framework Contents
Psychosocial Pressure Summary
In the matrix below, the provisional Emergent Framework Names are provided in the top row with the critical psychosocial pressure just below. That pressure determines the particular PH-L required in the
.Remember that the investigation of the oscillating duality.
in the Trees were given in advance: they emerged fromIt is not obvious why the frameworks have the elements that they do without invoking the logic of the analytic schema for handling life's challenges. The provisional verbal modifiers of the elements have been developed in the present inquiry.
The elements of the 7 emergent Root Tree frameworks qualified by the conjectured psychosocial pressure are shown L to R in order of the originating
(at bottom), and with the usual vertical arrangement (L7 at top).Better viewing: Use browser zoom if needed.
Refusing to Give Up | Reducing Conflict | Allowing Self Recovery | Resolving Differences | Overcoming Inertia | Asserting Expectations | Bypassing Resistance |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
needs Certainty |
needs
Well-Being |
needs
Selflessness |
needs
Understanding |
needs
Performance |
needs
Autonomy |
needs
Acceptability |
||
KL | Psychosocial Pressure | so use L2s Emergent RHK |
so use L4s Emergent RHK |
so use L7s Emergent RHK |
so use L5s Emergent RHK |
so use L1s Emergent RHK |
so use L6s Emergent RHK |
so use L3s Emergent RHK |
7 | Selflessness RL5-Communic'n |
Respect |
Respect |
Respect |
Respect |
Respect |
Respect |
Respect |
6 | Autonomy
RL3-Change |
Enable |
Enable |
Enable |
Enable |
Enable |
Enable |
Enable |
5 | Understanding RL2-Inquiry |
Clarify |
Clarify |
Clarify |
Clarify |
Clarify |
Clarify |
Clarify |
4 | Well-being
RL7-Willingness |
Feel good |
Feel good |
Feel good |
Feel good |
Feel good |
Feel good |
Feel good |
3 | Acceptability
RL6-Purpose |
Promote |
Promote |
Promote |
Promote |
Promote |
Promote |
Promote |
2 | Certainty
RL4-Experience |
Rely on |
Rely on |
Rely on |
Rely on |
Rely on |
Rely on |
Rely on |
1 | Performance
RL1-Action |
Activate |
Activate |
Activate |
Activate |
Activate |
Activate |
Activate |
Origin | From
|
From |
From |
From | From |
From |
From |
Inquiry Background
Here is a summary of how this matrix was developed.
Inquiry Challenge. How do the hierarchies that are built on Centres with identical PH-L numbers contribute to human functioning?
Inquiry Process. The original entry to understanding depended on two conjectures:
-
the special effort associated with reversal of the oscillating duality
- the move of to the KL4B position in the Tree.
As a result, I created a «scaffold for inquiry» that is available here.
Inquiry Break-through: Progress was slow and uncertain until I developed the following conjectures from investigating the Root Projection to Primary Hierarchies and Principal Typologies:
- This innate (instinctual) behavior. Each instinct is an affective drive which gives rise to a specific psychosocial pressure. derives from a specific form of
- Each PH framework has the pressure of its own elsewhere) each level within a PH has a one-to-one correspondence to a Root Level (i.e. RH-L# is specific for PH-L#) and has the pressure of that RH level. That means a Tree made up of a particular PH level has a 7-fold dose of one pressure. and (as explained
- Because the «emergent frameworks» are re-ordered , a standard psychosocial pressure applies at each level (KL) in the Tree, independent of the nature of the Centre element at that level.
An understanding of these frameworks has moved forward solidly by using the psychosocial pressures postulate—as indicated in the above matrix.
A much fuller explanation of each emergent framework now follows.
- Start with the Tree of all PH-L1 elements derived from forcing the reversal of the oscillating duality in . This Tree is conjectured to deal with overcoming your inertia.
Originally posted: 11-Oct-2013. Last amended: 20-Dec-2022